Here is the raw data collected during the one-week trial of The Urinator:
TEST SUBJECT ROCKY:
- Upon seeing The Urinator for the first time, test subject Rocky exclaimed, "There is no way I am sticking my dick into that."
- For three days, he insisted on using Mama Mara's bathroom. As a result, the researcher was able to determine with certainty that Rocky is not the household's urine mis-aimer.
- Rocky was
coercedconvinced to remain in the testing protocol as a control subject. After using The Urinator, he reported as follows: "I didn't like it. It was creepy. Where did my pee go?" - The researcher noted that Rocky failed to flush the toilet every time he used The Urinator, apparently believing that his pee had disappeared into some magical vortex.
TEST SUBJECT TAZ:
- Taz did not even notice the existence of The Urinator the first time he used the toilet on which it was installed. He simply stood at his regular spot some three feet away from the toilet and sprayed the exterior of the test product.
- A day later, he walked into the bathroom, yelled "What the --?", and ran outside to pee behind the air conditioning unit.
- When asked to at least try The Urinator, he closed the bathroom door, tinkled, and flushed. The researcher noted that there was no evidence of mis-aimage, but there was still a strong urine smell. Upon further examination, the researcher discovered that Taz had peed into the bathroom trash receptacle.
- Taz eventually was
forcedcoaxed to use The Urinator. Unfortunately, he ignored the foot-placement indicators, and the collateral damage of his mis-aimage actually increased.
At this time, the data do not make a compelling case in favor of continued use of The Urinator. Luckily, the product will not go to waste....

